Reply: Le Havre:: General:: Re: Multiple paths, but only a subset to victory?
by newbiebgg Le Havre is a very good and unique game not because it is a typical "Multiple paths to choose Euro game", as everyone know coke shipping is a dominant path in 2/3P game.And this game is...
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: General:: Re: Why is the game so expensive?
by BGOrion I do share the sentiment that this game is rather on the expensive side at the moment. I think that it is currently hard to get (due to no or small print runs). A couple of years ago Le...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Thread: Le Havre:: Rules:: Questions Newer Than Newbie
by gheilers Greetings everyone. I have become interested in Le Havre, and have been trying to learn it online, as well as with the iGadget app. I do not own the physical game yet, and that obviously...
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Rules:: Re: Questions Newer Than Newbie
by gamesgocrazy 1. That is the number of francs that you receive when shipping that item.2. The number of players on top and the number of food on the bottom, 1 player 5 food, 2 players 4 food...
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Rules:: Re: Questions Newer Than Newbie
by gheilers Thanks. That is what I figured, regarding the Goods tokens. With regards to shipping, does this mean that the more players there are, the *less* effective the ships are at reducing food...
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Rules:: Re: Questions Newer Than Newbie
by mjacobsca With fewer players you get more turns per harvest. So the food requirements are higher for less players.
View ArticleClik here to view.
New Image for Le Havre
by FlaMinGoConlittle plastic boxes to hold the resources of the game make set up much faster!
View ArticleObligatory End of 2014 Post Part VI: Top Interests of 2015: Top 10 List (Part...
by Aaron Rohrerhis post was originally written on my blog "Late To The Table..." on February 4, 2015 and can be found in it's original (including the original pictures) at the following...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Review: Le Havre:: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by davistylerr Le Havre is a very successful worker placement and resource management game that deserves the praise it receives. It is straight-forward yet complex where you will have a slew of choices...
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by Tariff Great game. Have only played 2 and 3 player. Not sure if i would like 4.
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by davistylerr Yeah I have played single as well to learn some strategy and I heard some have played with 5 and it was tough to do much.
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by tompen Le Havre is one of my favorites. I like it most as a 2 or 3 player. Four tends to drag and five is out of the question. That's my take after about 40 plays.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Reply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by doctoryes0tompen wrote:Le Havre is one of my favorites. I like it most as a 2 or 3 player. Four tends to drag and five is out of the question. That's my take after about 40 plays.I'm with you, but I...
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by Desideratadavistylerr wrote:…for a frankly inflated cost.Good one! :p
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: General:: Re: 2 Player Game Length for experienced players?
by duzy78 Maybe we are not counting every "penny" but for us 2 player game takes 60-80 minutes with setup. We are maybe not very experienced, but we both finish with about 150-200 points.
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by davypiDesiderata wrote:davistylerr wrote:…for a frankly inflated cost.Good one! :pThis is partially wrong, unless you are being sarcastic.Buying a wood ship for 14 francs on round 7 of a 3P game...
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by davistylerr That was really for the buildings part.
View ArticleReply: Le Havre:: Reviews:: Re: Le Havre: Satisfying and Fun
by grant5davistylerr wrote:That was really for the buildings part.How do you mean?
View Article