by doctoryes0
G3ck092 wrote:
doctoryes0 wrote:
LH is designed to be very narrow in the opening:
”I absolutely have to take the two wood or you’ll be offered three...”
”I absolutely have to take the two wood or you’ll be offered three...”
What do you personally think about 2 players? Some people seem to love it, others (as obvious by this thread), don't.
LH is the only game I own that varies so widely by player count that I could only think of it as separate ratings.
Ratings by player count:
1p= 6 (Feels more like practice for the game than a game. I don't really like solo play in general though.)
2p= 10 (You know what your opponent must do; they know what you must do. Massive tension as you plan turns ahead.)
3p= 7 (Nothing gained by the addition of a 3rd player except downtime. The ability to plan ahead is greatly diminished. Offense is no longer a factor: if you directly mess with one player, you and that player will fall behind the third.)
4p= 5 (Ridiculously chaotic. A shadow of the 2p game.)
5p= 2 (virtually unplayable)